info icon

Benign neoplasm: Ureter

CD2_BENIGN_URETER

Endpoint definition

Endpoint definition steps

FinnGen

Phenotype data

520210

1. Apply sex-specific rule

None

520210

2. Check conditions

None

520210

3. Check pre-conditions, main-only, mode, registry filters

Registry filters:

  • Hospital discharge: ICD-10 D30.2&
  • Hospital discharge: ICD-9 2232
  • Hospital discharge: ICD-8 2232
  • Cause of death: ICD-10 D30.2&
  • Cause of death: ICD-9 2232
  • Cause of death: ICD-8 2232

2 out of 7 registries used, show all original rules.

24

4. Check minimum number of events

None

24

5. Include endpoints

None

24

6. Filter based on genotype QC (FinnGen only)

24

Control definitions (FinnGen only)

Controls for this endpoint are individuals that are not cases.

Extra metadata

Level in the ICD hierarchy
3
First used in FinnGen datafreeze
DF2
Parent code in ICD-10
D30
Name in latin
Neoplasma benignum ureteris

Case counts by codes

FinnGen case counts by registry codes:

generic upset plot

Upset plot

Full data table

Summary Statistics

-FinRegistry-

Key figures

All Female Male
Number of individuals
Whole population 196 100 95
Only index persons 141 73 68
Unadjusted period prevalence (%)
Whole population 0.00 0.00 0.00
Only index persons 0.00 0.00 0.00
Median age at first event (years)
Whole population 62.14 59.60 64.89
Only index persons 58.62 56.12 61.30

-FinnGen-

Key figures

All Female Male
Number of individuals 24 14 10
Unadjusted period prevalence (%) 0.00 0.00 0.00
Median age at first event (years) 64.27 66.36 61.35

-FinRegistry-

Age distribution of first events

-FinnGen-

Age distribution of first events

-FinRegistry-

Year distribution of first events

-FinnGen-

Year distribution of first events

-FinRegistry-

Cumulative Incidence Function

No data

-FinnGen-

Cumulative Incidence Function

Not a core endpoint, no data to show.

CodeWAS (R11)

CodeWAS is a tool for exploring the associations between an endpoint and all of the medical codes and drug codes.

This is a new tool, please reach out using the contact form for feedback and improvement ideas.

First, a cohort is built by matching controls to the endpoint cases using year of birth and sex. Then, a Fisher test is done for all the medical codes and drug codes between the cases and controls of this cohort. Codes are reported in the table below if they have −log10(p-value) ≥ 6.

No data available

LabWAS

OMOP Concept
People with measurements
Mean N measurements
Mean measured value
(ID) Name
N Cases
N Controls
OR
-log10(p)
cases
controls
cases
controls
unit
-log10(p)
N cases
N controls
16
95
3.04
1.80
2.4
2.1
98.4
92.8
pmol/l
—
7
43
6
24
2.98
1.40
1.0
1.3
—
—
—
0
0
6
25
2.85
1.34
1.0
1.7
—
—
—
0
0
13
82
2.28
1.07
6.4
4.5
7.5
30.3
e6/l
—
8
63
12
75
2.20
0.99
4.8
3.5
13.5
863.5
e6/l
—
7
61
16
118
2.06
0.87
3.1
12.7
4.1
4.6
e9/l
—
10
107
5
29
1.91
0.68
1.2
1.3
—
—
—
0
0
9
59
1.84
0.66
8.3
6.2
—
7.4
—
0
15
0
20
0.00
0.63
0.0
3.3
—
—
—
0
0
0
19
0.00
0.63
0.0
4.9
—
—
—
0
0
7
45
1.78
0.56
5.7
3.2
77.1
91.0
%
—
7
45
17
139
1.76
0.56
5.6
5.8
—
32.3
—
0
6
5
30
1.84
0.47
6.0
5.1
—
—
—
0
0
9
66
1.58
0.46
4.2
5.7
—
—
—
0
0
9
66
1.58
0.46
5.6
3.1
—
—
—
0
0
9
67
1.55
0.46
1.6
2.4
—
—
—
0
0
5
32
1.71
0.45
4.6
2.3
20.0
19.6
%
—
5
26
0
16
0.00
0.43
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
18
0.00
0.41
0.0
1.3
—
—
—
0
0
10
77
1.51
0.33
1.4
1.9
—
—
—
0
0
11
89
1.44
0.27
3.6
12.5
0.0
0.0
e9/l
—
6
80
19
202
0.72
0.25
23.7
22.3
107.8
79.9
umol/l
0.75
19
202
10
81
1.40
0.24
1.9
5.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
11
0.00
0.22
0.0
4.4
—
127.3
—
0
11
0
12
0.00
0.22
0.0
2.1
—
1.1
—
0
12
0
13
0.00
0.21
0.0
2.3
—
—
—
0
0
5
68
0.67
0.20
2.0
4.8
—
—
—
0
0
10
83
1.35
0.19
3.2
3.5
—
—
—
0
0
15
138
1.23
0.17
2.9
4.4
—
—
—
0
0
19
198
0.81
0.11
13.3
17.1
—
—
—
0
0
5
44
1.17
0.11
1.8
4.4
—
—
—
0
0
13
118
1.22
0.10
4.2
4.3
7.1
6.8
mmol/l
0.17
13
109
6
72
0.78
0.09
5.3
5.2
3.8
2.0
ug/l
—
6
61
8
88
0.86
0.08
3.9
4.8
—
—
—
0
0
12
131
0.83
0.08
2.9
6.9
11.1
10.8
umol/l
0.07
12
125
10
109
0.86
0.05
2.0
5.1
—
0.0
—
0
20
10
106
0.90
0.01
3.3
7.4
—
0.0
—
0
22
11
106
1.07
0.00
2.3
5.1
—
0.0
—
0
23
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.2
—
3.9
—
0
6
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.2
—
107.5
—
0
6
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.2
—
—
—
0
0
5
56
0.87
0.00
1.4
4.8
—
0.0
—
0
22
15
153
0.95
0.00
25.1
17.4
39.5
40.7
%
—
10
93
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
15
148
1.04
0.00
3.9
5.1
—
—
—
0
0
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
5.6
—
8.1
—
0
5
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
5.6
—
—
—
0
0
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.9
—
1.2
—
0
7
0
9
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.1
—
—
—
0
0
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
5.6
—
4.9
—
0
5
7
68
1.04
0.00
4.7
4.8
—
—
—
0
0
0
9
0.00
0.00
0.0
4.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
9
0.00
0.00
0.0
4.1
—
0.8
—
0
9
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
3.3
—
116.7
—
0
7
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.0
—
7.1
—
0
5
6
58
1.05
0.00
1.7
9.1
—
—
—
0
0
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.9
—
5.7
—
0
7
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.4
—
—
—
0
0
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
33.6
—
6.5
—
0
5
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.6
—
13.1
—
0
5
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
6.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.1
—
—
—
0
0

Mortality – FinRegistry

Association

Association between endpoint CD2_BENIGN_URETER and mortality.

Females

No data

Males

No data

Mortality risk

Mortality risk for people of age

years, who have CD2_BENIGN_URETER.

N-year risk Females Males
1 No data No data
5 No data No data
10 No data No data
15 No data No data
20 No data No data

Relationships between endpoints

Index endpoint: CD2_BENIGN_URETER – Benign neoplasm: Ureter

GWS hits: -

Endpoint
Case Overlap
Survival Analysis
Genetic Correlations
Genetic Signals
N (Jaccard index)
HR [CI]
rg [CI]
Hits
Coloc Hits
FinRegistry
FinnGen
FinRegistry
FinnGen
FinnGen
loading spinner Loading data