Carcinoma in situ of penis

CD2_INSITU_PENIS_EXALLC

Endpoint definition

Endpoint definition steps

FinnGen

Phenotype data

1. Apply sex-specific rule

only males

-

2. Check conditions

  • not C3_PENIS
-

3. Check pre-conditions, main-only, mode, registry filters

Registry filters:

  • Hospital discharge: ICD-10 D07.4&
  • Hospital discharge: ICD-9 2335
  • Cause of death: ICD-10 D07.4&
  • Cause of death: ICD-9 2335
  • Cancer registry: Topography ICD-O-3 C60
  • Cancer registry: Morphology ICD-O-3 ANY
  • Cancer registry: Behaviour codes 2

3 out of 7 registries used, show all original rules.

-

4. Check minimum number of events

None

-

5. Include endpoints

None

-

6. Filter based on genotype QC (FinnGen only)

None

-

Control definitions (FinnGen only)

Control exclude
C3_CANCER, C3_CANCER_WIDE

Extra metadata

Level in the ICD hierarchy
3
First used in FinnGen datafreeze
DF9
Parent code in ICD-10
D07
Name in latin
Carcinoma in situ vesicae urinariae

Case counts by codes

FinnGen case counts by registry codes:

No upset plot: script not run.

No upset table: script not run.

Summary Statistics

-FinRegistry-

Key figures

All Female Male
Number of individuals
Whole population - - -
Only index persons - - -
Unadjusted period prevalence (%)
Whole population - - -
Only index persons - - -
Median age at first event (years)
Whole population - - -
Only index persons - - -

-FinnGen-

Key figures

All Female Male
Number of individuals 54 - 54
Unadjusted period prevalence (%) 0.02 - 0.02
Median age at first event (years) 66.19 - 66.19

-FinRegistry-

Age distribution of first events

-FinnGen-

Age distribution of first events

-FinRegistry-

Year distribution of first events

-FinnGen-

Year distribution of first events

-FinRegistry-

Cumulative Incidence Function

No data

-FinnGen-

Cumulative Incidence Function

No data

CodeWAS (R11)

CodeWAS is a tool for exploring the associations between an endpoint and all of the medical codes and drug codes.

This is a new tool, please reach out using the contact form for feedback and improvement ideas.

First, a cohort is built by matching controls to the endpoint cases using year of birth and sex. Then, a Fisher test is done for all the medical codes and drug codes between the cases and controls of this cohort. Codes are reported in the table below if they have −log10(p-value) ≥ 6.

No data available

LabWAS

OMOP Concept
People with measurements
Mean N measurements
Mean measured value
(ID) Name
N Cases
N Controls
OR
-log10(p)
cases
controls
cases
controls
unit
-log10(p)
N cases
N controls
15
15
13.46
13.77
1.6
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
13
14
11.91
11.23
1.7
1.1
—
—
—
0
0
31
95
6.31
10.53
3.6
1.4
—
—
—
0
0
15
27
7.31
8.57
1.5
1.1
—
—
—
0
0
29
126
3.81
5.55
13.2
5.5
—
—
—
0
0
20
68
4.08
5.42
1.7
2.5
—
—
—
0
0
21
81
3.61
4.67
14.1
5.2
—
—
—
0
0
15
49
3.85
4.19
1.3
1.9
—
—
—
0
0
22
102
2.95
3.48
3.8
2.5
—
—
—
0
0
22
104
2.88
3.34
4.5
2.3
—
—
—
0
0
7
11
7.12
3.30
3.0
1.5
—
—
—
0
0
33
197
2.74
3.17
9.6
5.2
0.0
0.0
e9/l
0.24
27
171
33
197
2.74
3.17
9.6
5.2
0.7
0.6
e9/l
0.54
27
170
33
203
2.61
2.89
10.8
5.3
0.2
0.2
e9/l
0.16
28
176
15
64
2.86
2.68
3.4
2.8
14.7
12.1
umol/l
0.55
15
59
12
46
3.07
2.56
1.4
1.8
—
—
—
0
0
24
133
2.45
2.55
7.5
4.1
—
—
—
0
0
13
55
2.80
2.34
3.7
2.9
28.7
24.5
%
0.32
13
47
29
181
2.30
2.30
12.9
8.8
0.0
0.0
e9/l
0.00
23
146
28
180
2.15
1.99
2.4
1.9
95.6
86.0
pmol/l
0.36
16
106
7
24
3.19
1.79
2.4
2.0
—
—
—
0
0
10
43
2.63
1.72
2.3
1.4
—
—
—
0
0
28
189
2.00
1.67
3.8
4.1
34.3
53.7
ng/l
0.52
21
145
8
149
0.46
1.29
3.1
3.4
—
—
—
0
0
14
80
2.01
1.28
2.7
1.9
4.6
2.7
e6/l
0.43
14
62
34
261
1.82
1.25
6.6
3.6
—
—
—
0
0
43
356
2.02
1.23
37.5
15.8
40.5
41.2
%
0.31
33
236
16
98
1.90
1.20
3.1
3.6
31.9
250.6
ng/l
1.37
11
82
9
47
2.09
1.09
1.3
1.1
—
—
—
0
0
11
61
2.01
1.08
1.7
1.2
2.1
2.6
g/l
—
5
35
5
22
2.40
1.05
8.6
41.5
—
—
—
0
0
5
22
2.40
1.05
3.0
1.4
—
—
—
0
0
15
94
1.82
1.04
1.2
1.3
—
—
—
0
0
7
35
2.15
1.04
3.7
1.6
—
—
—
0
0
7
36
2.08
1.01
1.7
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
28
0.00
1.01
0.0
1.4
—
—
—
0
0
6
28
2.28
0.95
9.2
4.0
—
—
—
0
0
47
417
1.98
0.92
33.4
13.9
40.0
27.5
mg/l
0.74
40
328
8
47
1.82
0.85
1.5
2.2
—
—
—
0
0
8
47
1.82
0.85
9.1
11.1
—
—
—
0
0
39
331
1.64
0.82
5.7
3.9
3.7
2.1
ug/l
0.30
33
294
0
26
0.00
0.81
0.0
16.6
—
—
—
0
0
14
93
1.68
0.79
4.6
2.9
—
—
—
0
0
5
23
2.29
0.78
9.6
3.7
—
—
—
0
0
6
34
1.86
0.61
1.8
1.6
—
—
—
0
0
6
37
1.70
0.58
1.0
1.3
—
—
—
0
0
35
308
1.39
0.47
4.6
4.4
—
—
—
0
0
8
57
1.47
0.45
6.8
19.6
-0.3
1.0
mmol/l
—
8
39
22
183
1.34
0.41
9.2
11.9
1.5
1.4
inr
—
6
47
13
99
1.41
0.40
3.6
2.5
—
—
—
0
0
6
41
1.52
0.37
8.2
2.5
—
—
—
0
0
5
39
1.31
0.23
8.4
3.5
—
—
—
0
0
0
11
0.00
0.21
0.0
2.8
—
2.6
—
0
5
0
12
0.00
0.21
0.0
4.4
—
7.3
—
0
12
0
13
0.00
0.21
0.0
4.2
—
2.0
—
0
13
0
14
0.00
0.20
0.0
1.1
—
—
—
0
0
45
436
1.19
0.14
25.8
13.5
—
—
—
0
0
17
154
1.15
0.12
4.2
3.0
—
—
—
0
0
15
140
1.10
0.05
7.1
4.2
—
—
—
0
0
10
98
1.03
0.00
2.6
3.3
—
—
—
0
0
0
8
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.8
—
—
—
0
0
0
8
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.8
—
4.1
—
0
8
0
8
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.8
—
105.4
—
0
8
7
78
0.88
0.00
5.4
4.3
—
—
—
0
0
0
7
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.2
—
—
—
0
0
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
2.8
—
—
—
0
0
5
56
0.88
0.00
2.8
2.9
2.1
7.3
ug/l
—
5
49
0
5
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.0
—
—
—
0
0
0
6
0.00
0.00
0.0
1.0
—
—
—
0
0
5
49
1.02
0.00
10.0
3.6
0.6
1.6
mmol/l
—
5
37

Mortality – FinRegistry

Association

Association between endpoint CD2_INSITU_PENIS_EXALLC and mortality.

Females

No data

Males

No data

Mortality risk

Mortality risk for people of age

years, who have CD2_INSITU_PENIS_EXALLC.

N-year risk Females Males
1 No data No data
5 No data No data
10 No data No data
15 No data No data
20 No data No data

Relationships between endpoints

Index endpoint: CD2_INSITU_PENIS_EXALLC – Carcinoma in situ of penis

GWS hits: -

Endpoint
Case Overlap
Survival Analysis
Genetic Correlations
Genetic Signals
N (Jaccard index)
HR [CI]
rg [CI]
Hits
Coloc Hits
FinRegistry
FinnGen
FinRegistry
FinnGen
FinnGen
loading spinner Loading data